![]() , the Firm secured a withdrawal of Mischief where a Toronto Teacher was caught using a fire extinguisher and pulling the Fire Alarm in a Toronto Condo, ultimately consuming nearly $5000.00 of Toronto Fire resources. K.C. , the Firm defended a female with Impaired Driving charges who was subsequently charged with Mischief for clogging the toilet at the police station. The Firm has also defended allegations of Mischief in the context of other charges. , the Firm secured a withdrawal where the accused threw water at slot machines at Toronto’s Woodbine Race Track. The Firm has handled a number of property crimes in Toronto. Now, the distinction between public and private property no longer exists. 387(3), it was essential to identify and prove the property as public property. 387(1) defined mischief in relation to property and prohibited mischief to public and private property. 430 of the Criminal Code and differs substantially from the previous offence as it was described in the former s. Presently, the offence of mischief is governed by s. The Firm has also defended a number of young people, including Art students, who have been apprehended tagging or spray painting public property. , where it secured a withdrawal of all counts of mischief for a “streaker” at the Toronto Blue Jays Home Opener. The Firm has defended a number of high profile mischief allegations, including its R. We have resolved a number of mischief allegations, often well in advance of trial and without a criminal record. The severity of a mischief charge depends on the nature of the offence and the context in which it occurred. The Firm frequently handles high profile allegations of mischief in Toronto.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |